Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Gap-filling carbon dioxide, water, energy, and methane fluxes in challenging ecosystems: Comparing between methods, drivers, and gap-lengths

Songyan Zhu, Jon McCalmont, L. M. Cardenas, Andrew M. Cunliffe, Louise Olde, Caroline Signori‐Müller, M. E. Litvak, Timothy C. Hill

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · 2023

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Eddy covariance serves as one the most effective techniques for long-term monitoring of ecosystem fluxes, however long-term data integrations rely on complete timeseries, meaning that any gaps due to missing data must be reliably filled. To date, many gap-filling approaches have been proposed and extensively evaluated for mature and/or less actively managed ecosystems. Random forest regression (RFR) has been shown to be stable and perform better in these systems than alternative approaches, particularly when filling longer gaps. However, the performance of RFR gap filling remains less certain in more challenging ecosystems, e.g., actively managed agri-ecosystems and following recent land-use change due to management disturbances, ecosystems with relatively low fluxes due to low signal to n

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109365
Catalogue ID
BFmoakvjs3-3c8g82
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.