Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

The metabolic effects of intermittent versus continuous feeding in critically ill patients

Daniel J. Wilkinson, Iain J. Gallagher, Angela McNelly, Danielle E. Bear, Nicholas Hart, Hugh Montgomery, Adrien Le Guennec, Maria R. Conte, Thomas Francis, Stephen D. R. Harridge, Philip J. Atherton, Zudin Puthucheary

Scientific Reports · 2023

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Intermittent (or bolus) feeding regimens in critically ill patients have been of increasing interest to clinicians and scientists. Changes in amino acid, fat and carbohydrate metabolites over time might yet deliver other benefits (e.g. modulation of the circadian rhythm and sleep, and impacts on ghrelin secretion, insulin resistance and autophagy). We set out to characterise these changes in metabolite concentration. The Intermittent versus Continuous Feeding in Critically Ill paitents study (NCT02358512) was an eight-centre single-blinded randomised controlled trial. Patients were randomised to received a continuous (control arm) or intermittent (6x/day, intervention arm) enteral feeding regimen. Blood samples were taken on trial days 1, 7 and 10 immediately before and 30 min after interm

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1038/s41598-023-46490-5
Catalogue ID
BFmoakvpzf-xn93la
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.