Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Food waste interventions in low-and-middle-income countries: A systematic literature review

Heike B. Rolker, Mark C. Eisler, L. M. Cardenas, Megan Deeney, Taro Takahashi

Resources Conservation and Recycling · 2022

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This systematic review synthesises evidence from a large literature search on food waste reduction interventions in low- and middle-income countries, examining how such interventions can simultaneously address food security, income generation, and environmental objectives. The authors develop a classification framework based on value chain position and mechanism of action, emphasising that effectiveness depends on optimising interventions across interconnected actors to achieve systemic rather than isolated gains. The review highlights the complexity of designing and implementing food waste interventions that benefit multiple stakeholders without shifting costs or burdens within the food system.

UK applicability

While this review focuses on low- and middle-income countries, the classification framework and evidence on multi-sectoral benefits may inform UK food waste policy, particularly regarding domestic waste reduction in institutional and retail settings. However, the applicability is limited as the UK's food security, infrastructure, and value chain dynamics differ substantially from those of low- and middle-income contexts.

Key measures

Intervention classification by value chain position and mechanism of action; multi-sectoral outcomes including food security, livelihood income, and environmental impacts; evidence synthesis from 8,318 screened studies

Outcomes reported

The systematic review synthesised evidence on food waste reduction interventions across the value chain in low- and middle-income countries, evaluating their effects on food security, livelihood income, and environmental sustainability. The study classified interventions by value chain position and mechanism of action to assess their potential for multi-sectoral benefits.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Food security & global nutrition
Study type
Systematic Review
Study design
Systematic review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Food supply chain
DOI
10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106534
Catalogue ID
BFmobghqjf-5vqn9i

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.