Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

A comparison of soil tests for available phosphorus in long‐term field experiments in Europe

Sophie Nawara, Toon van Dael, Roel Merckx, Fien Amery, Annemie Elsen, Wendy Odeurs, Hans Vandendriessche, S. P. McGrath, Christian Roisin, Claire Jouany, Sylvain Pellerin, Pascal Denoroy, Bettina Eichler‐Löbermann, Gunnar Börjesson, Peter Goos, Wannes Akkermans, Erik Smolders

European Journal of Soil Science · 2017

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Summary Most soil tests for available phosphorus (P) perform rather poorly in predicting crop response. This study was set up to compare different established soil tests in their capacity to predict crop response across contrasting types of soil. Soil samples from long‐term field experiments, the oldest >100 years old, were collected in five European countries. The total number of soil samples ( n = 218), which differed in cropping and P treatment, and originated from 11 different soil types, were analysed with five tests: ammonium oxalate (Ox), ammonium lactate (AL), Olsen P, 0.01 m CaCl 2 and the diffusive gradient in thin film (DGT). The first three tests denote available P quantity (Q), whereas the last two indicate P intensity (I) of the soil solution. All five tests were positivel

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1111/ejss.12486
Catalogue ID
BFmobghtqh-9zaog6
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.