Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm

D. P. Aguillard, T. Albahri, D. Allspach, A. V. Anisenkov, K. Badgley, S. Baeßler, I. Bailey, Laura Bailey, V. A. Baranov, E. Barlas-Yucel, T. Barrett, E. Barzi, F. Bedeschi, Martin Berz, Meghna Bhattacharya, H. P. Binney, P. Bloom, J. Bono, Elia Bottalico, T. J. V. Bowcock, S. Braun, M. Bressler, G. Cantatore, R. M. Carey, B. C. K. Casey, D. Cauz, R. Chakraborty, A. Chapelain, S. Chappa, S. Charity, Chen Cheng, M.-T. Cheng, R. T. Chislett, Z. Chu, T. E. Chupp, C. Claessens, M. E. Convery, S. Corrodi, L. Cotrozzi, J. Crnkovic, С.Б. Дабагов, P. T. Debevec, S. Di Falco, G. Di Sciascio, B. Drendel, A. Driutti, V. N. Duginov, M. Eads, A. Edmonds, J. Esquivel, M. Farooq, R. Fatemi, C. Ferrari, M. Fertl, Aaron Fienberg, A. Fioretti, D. Flay, S. B. Foster, H. Friedsam, Nathan Froemming, C. Gabbanini, I. Gaines, M. D. Galati, S. Ganguly, A. Garcı́a, J. George, L. Gibbons, A. Gioiosa, K. L. Giovanetti, P. Girotti, W. Gohn, L. Goodenough, T. P. Gorringe, J. Grange, S. Grant, F. Gray, Selçuk Hacıömeroğlu, T. Halewood-leagas, D. Hampai, F. Han, J. Hempstead, D. W. Hertzog, G. G. Hesketh, E. Hess, Angela Hibbert, Z. Hodge, K. W. Hong, R. Hong, T. Hu, Y. Hu, M. Iacovacci, M. Incagli, P. Kammel, M. Kargiantoulakis, M. Karuza, J. Kašpar, D. Kawall, L. Kelton, A. Keshavarzi, D. Kessler

Physical Review Letters · 2023

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

We present a new measurement of the positive muon magnetic anomaly, a_{μ}≡(g_{μ}-2)/2, from the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment using data collected in 2019 and 2020. We have analyzed more than 4 times the number of positrons from muon decay than in our previous result from 2018 data. The systematic error is reduced by more than a factor of 2 due to better running conditions, a more stable beam, and improved knowledge of the magnetic field weighted by the muon distribution, ω[over ˜]_{p}^{'}, and of the anomalous precession frequency corrected for beam dynamics effects, ω_{a}. From the ratio ω_{a}/ω[over ˜]_{p}^{'}, together with precisely determined external parameters, we determine a_{μ}=116 592 057(25)×10^{-11} (0.21 ppm). Combining this result with our previous result from the 2018 data,

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.131.161802
Catalogue ID
BFmobghvmf-a81dq7
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.