Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Collider scope: when selection bias can substantially influence observed associations

Marcus R. Munafò, Kate Tilling, Amy E. Taylor, David M. Evans, George Davey Smith

International Journal of Epidemiology · 2017

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Large-scale cross-sectional and cohort studies have transformed our understanding of the genetic and environmental determinants of health outcomes. However, the representativeness of these samples may be limited-either through selection into studies, or by attrition from studies over time. Here we explore the potential impact of this selection bias on results obtained from these studies, from the perspective that this amounts to conditioning on a collider (i.e. a form of collider bias). Whereas it is acknowledged that selection bias will have a strong effect on representativeness and prevalence estimates, it is often assumed that it should not have a strong impact on estimates of associations. We argue that because selection can induce collider bias (which occurs when two variables indepen

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1093/ije/dyx206
Catalogue ID
BFmoef2ocf-s9z51y
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.