Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Publications on Clinical Research in Otolaryngology–A Systematic Analysis of Leading Journals in 2010

Nina M. Kaper, Geerte G. J. Ramakers, Mark C. J. Aarts, Geert J. M. G. van der Heijden

Frontiers in Surgery · 2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

<b>Background:</b> We wanted to asses and characterize the volume of Otolaryngology publications on clinical research, published in major journals. <b>Methods and Material:</b> To assess volume and study type of clinical research in Otolaryngology we performed a literature search in high impact factor journals. We included 10 high impact factor Otolaryngology journals and 20 high impact factor medical journals outside this field (2011). We extracted original publications and systematic reviews from 2010. Publications were classified according to their research question, that is therapy, diagnosis, prognosis or etiology. <b>Results:</b> From Otolaryngology journals (impact factor 1.8 to 2.8) we identified 694 (46%) publications on original observations and 27 (2%) systematic reviews. From s

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.3389/fsurg.2019.00018
Catalogue ID
BFmoef2qvj-mqg1xd
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.