Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

The impact of standard and hard‐coded parameters on the hydrologic fluxes in the Noah‐MP land surface model

Matthias Cuntz, Juliane Mai, Luis Samaniego, Martyn Clark, Volker Wulfmeyer, Oliver Branch, Sabine Attinger, Stephan Thober

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2016

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Abstract Land surface models incorporate a large number of process descriptions, containing a multitude of parameters. These parameters are typically read from tabulated input files. Some of these parameters might be fixed numbers in the computer code though, which hinder model agility during calibration. Here we identified 139 hard‐coded parameters in the model code of the Noah land surface model with multiple process options (Noah‐MP). We performed a Sobol' global sensitivity analysis of Noah‐MP for a specific set of process options, which includes 42 out of the 71 standard parameters and 75 out of the 139 hard‐coded parameters. The sensitivities of the hydrologic output fluxes latent heat and total runoff as well as their component fluxes were evaluated at 12 catchments within the Unite

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1002/2016jd025097
Catalogue ID
BFmoef2us1-2bu862
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.