Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Subjective modeling decisions can significantly impact the simulation of flood and drought events

Lieke Melsen, Adriaan J. Teuling, P.J.J.F. Torfs, Massimiliano Zappa, Naoki Mizukami, Pablo A. Mendoza, Martyn Clark, R. Uijlenhoet

Journal of Hydrology · 2018

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

It is generally acknowledged in the environmental sciences that the choice of a computational model impacts the research results. In this study of a flood and drought event in the Swiss Thur basin, we show that modeling decisions during the model configuration, beyond the model choice, also impact the model results. In our carefully designed experiment we investigated four modeling decisions in ten nested basins: the spatial resolution of the model, the spatial representation of the forcing data, the calibration period, and the performance metric. The flood characteristics were mainly affected by the performance metric, whereas the drought characteristics were mainly affected by the calibration period. The results could be related to the processes that triggered the particular events studi

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.046
Catalogue ID
BFmoef2us2-mk9kbq
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.