Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryIndustry / policy report

Gene Editing: The New Frontier for Climate Innovation

Robert Rozansky, Val Giddings, David M. Hart

2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This policy report from the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation examines gene editing as an emerging technology for addressing climate change in agriculture and related sectors. The authors argue that current regulatory frameworks may constrain the development and deployment of gene-edited crops and organisms with potential climate benefits, and advocate for proportionate, science-based regulation. The paper appears to frame gene editing as a significant but underutilised tool for agricultural climate resilience and emissions reduction.

UK applicability

The findings are relevant to UK regulatory policy on gene editing, particularly given the United Kingdom's post-Brexit autonomy on biotechnology governance and its commitment to net-zero agriculture. The report's argument for science-based proportionate regulation may inform UK policy discussions around gene-edited organisms and climate adaptation, though the United States regulatory context differs from the United Kingdom's framework.

Key measures

Regulatory framework analysis; potential climate benefits of gene-edited organisms; policy recommendations

Outcomes reported

The report evaluates gene editing as a tool for climate mitigation and agricultural adaptation, examining regulatory barriers and policy frameworks. It assesses the potential of gene-edited crops and organisms to enhance climate resilience and reduce agricultural greenhouse gas emissions.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Policy
Study design
Policy report
Source type
Policy report
Status
Published
Geography
United States
System type
Other
Catalogue ID
BFmokjo2nj-bzg7k4

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.