Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Dual‐guild herbivory disrupts predator‐prey interactions in the field

Carmen K. Blubaugh, Jacob S. Asplund, Sanford D. Eigenbrode, Matthew J. Morra, Christopher R. Philips, Inna E. Popova, John P. Reganold, William E. Snyder

Ecology · 2018

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Plant defenses often mediate whether competing chewing and sucking herbivores indirectly benefit or harm one another. Dual-guild herbivory also can muddle plant signals used by specialist natural enemies to locate prey, further complicating the net impact of herbivore-herbivore interactions in naturally diverse settings. While dual-guild herbivore communities are common in nature, consequences for top-down processes are unclear, as chemically mediated tri-trophic interactions are rarely evaluated in field environments. Combining observational and experimental approaches in the open field, we test a prediction that chewing herbivores interfere with top-down suppression of phloem feeders on Brassica oleracea across broad landscapes. In a two-year survey of 52 working farm sites, we found tha

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1002/ecy.2192
Catalogue ID
BFmokjo5hf-zu6em6
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.