Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Soil carbon sequestration potential bounded by population growth, land availability, food production, and climate change

Sonja G. Keel, Daniel Bretscher, Jens Leifeld, Albert von Ow, Chloé Wüst‐Galley

Carbon Management · 2023

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Improving soil management to enhance soil carbon sequestration (SCS)—a cost-efficient carbon dioxide (CO2) removal approach—can result in co-benefits or trade-offs. Here we address this issue by setting up a modeling framework for Switzerland that combines soil carbon (C) storage, food production and agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The link to food production is crucial because crop types and livestock numbers influence soil organic C (SOC) stocks, through soil C inputs from plants and manure. We estimated SCS rates for the years 2020–2050 for three scenarios, each with two variants for biochar: cover cropping (0.30 t CO2 equivalents [CO2-eq] ha−1 yr−1), biochar addition (0.36–1.8 t CO2-eq ha−1 yr−1) and agroforestry-biochar addition (2.2–2.3 t CO2-eq ha−1 yr−1). Different lim

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1080/17583004.2023.2244456
Catalogue ID
BFmokjo62o-eu8pcr
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.