Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

A Grant-Based Experiment to Train Clinical Investigators: The AACR/ASCO Methods in Clinical Cancer Research Workshop

Daniel D. Von Hoff, Gary M. Clark, Charles A. Coltman, Mary L. Disis, S. Gail Eckhardt, Lee M. Ellis, Margaret Foti, Elizabeth Garrett‐Mayer, Mithat Gönen, Manuel Hidalgo, Susan G. Hilsenbeck, John H. Littlefield, Patricia LoRusso, H. Kim Lyerly, Neal J. Meropol, Jyoti D. Patel, Steven Piantadosi, Dean A. Post, Meredith M. Regan, Yu Shyr, Margaret A. Tempero, Joel E. Tepper, Jamie Von Roenn, Louis M. Weiner, Donn C. Young, Nu Viet Vu

Clinical Cancer Research · 2021

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

< 0.001). Across the classes, student evaluations were very favorable. At the end of the workshop, faculty rated 92% to 100% of the students' protocols as ready for IRB submission. Intermediate and long-term follow-ups indicated that more than 92% of students were actively involved in patient-related research, and 66% had implemented five or more protocols. This NCI-sponsored MCCRW has had a major impact on the training of clinicians in their ability to design and implement clinical trials in cancer research.

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-1799
Catalogue ID
BFmokjoe04-o2ojgd
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.