Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Ambitious food system interventions required to mitigate the risk of exceeding Earth’s environmental limits

Michalis Hadjikakou, Nicholas Bowles, Özge Geyik, J.G. Conijn, José M. Mogollón, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Adrian Müller, Isabelle Weindl, Enayat A. Moallemi, M. Abdullah Shaikh, Kerstin Damerau, Kyle Frankel Davis, Stephan Pfister, Marco Springmann, Michael Clark, Geneviève S. Metson, Elin Röös, Bojana Bajželj, Neal T. Graham, Dominik Wisser, Jonathan Doelman, Андре Депперманн, Michaela C. Theurl, Prajal Pradhan, Miodrag Stevanović, Christian Lauk, Jinfeng Chang, Vera Heck, Ertug Ercin, Liqing Peng, Nathaniel Springer, Lex Bouwman, Tiago G. Morais, Hugo Valin, Daniel Mason-D’Croz, Karl‐Heinz Erb, Alexander Popp, Mario Herrero, Patrice Dumas, Xin Zhang, Brett A. Bryan

One Earth · 2025

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2025 modelling study by an international research consortium examines the scale and scope of food system transformation required to remain within Earth's critical environmental limits whilst sustaining human nutrition and food security. The analysis integrates multiple intervention pathways—including dietary shifts, changes to agricultural production intensity, and waste reduction—to identify which combinations of policies and behaviours can simultaneously address climate change, land degradation, freshwater stress, and nutrient cycling. The research suggests that single-sector or single-lever interventions are insufficient, and that coordinated action across production, consumption, and waste management is essential to achieve sustainability.

UK applicability

The findings are applicable to UK food policy and agriculture, particularly regarding the need for integrated strategies spanning dietary guidance, farm practice reform, and supply-chain efficiency. However, the global modelling may require contextualisation to UK-specific environmental pressures (notably soil health and water quality in lowland arable regions) and policy frameworks (CAP successor schemes, net-zero commitments).

Key measures

Planetary boundary metrics (greenhouse gas emissions, land-use change, freshwater depletion, nutrient pollution); dietary adequacy; food security indicators; synergies and trade-offs across intervention scenarios

Outcomes reported

The study modelled multiple food system intervention levers and their combined effects on staying within critical planetary boundaries (climate, land use, freshwater, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles). It assessed trade-offs and synergies between dietary change, agricultural intensification or extensification, and food waste reduction in achieving environmental sustainability whilst maintaining nutritional adequacy and food security.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Research
Study design
Modelling study / Integrated assessment
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Food supply chain
DOI
10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101351
Catalogue ID
BFmokjof1a-jcbtgt

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.