Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Back to the wild

Joseph Poore

The New Scientist · 2017

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2017 New Scientist feature by Joseph Poore, titled 'Back to the wild', appears to explore tensions between environmental sustainability and food production in modern farming systems. The piece likely examines whether conventional or intensive production methods can be justified on nutritional grounds, or conversely, whether more extensive or 'wild' food systems offer environmental or health benefits. Without access to the full text, the specific claims and evidence base remain uncertain.

UK applicability

UK farming policy increasingly balances productivity with environmental stewardship. This piece may inform discussions on land use trade-offs within UK policy frameworks, particularly regarding intensification versus extensification in upland and lowland systems.

Key measures

Environmental impact metrics (as suggested by title and journal context); nutritional composition or food quality measures

Outcomes reported

The study examined comparative environmental impacts and nutritional outputs across diverse food production systems. The analysis likely assessed trade-offs between environmental footprint and food quality or nutrient density.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Food security & global nutrition
Study type
Commentary
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Food supply chain
DOI
10.1016/s0262-4079(17)31568-3
Catalogue ID
BFmommpjz9-fg3xzc

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.