Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryGrey literature

Response to ARPA-E RFI Regarding Pre-Pilot and Pilot R&D Projects

David M. Hart

2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This is a policy response document from David M. Hart (likely of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation) submitted to the Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy (ARPA-E) in response to a request for information regarding pre-pilot and pilot research and development projects. As a grey literature policy submission, the document presumably articulates strategic recommendations or priorities for ARPA-E's agricultural and energy-focused R&D funding, though without access to the full text, specific claims cannot be confirmed.

UK applicability

Limited direct applicability to UK policy, as this addresses United States federal funding mechanisms. However, insights into priority-setting and evaluation frameworks for agricultural innovation funding may be relevant to UK research council decision-making and agricultural R&D strategy.

Key measures

Not applicable; policy response document rather than empirical measurement study

Outcomes reported

Response document outlining research and development priorities and recommendations for ARPA-E's pre-pilot and pilot programmes. The document likely assessed funding mechanisms and strategic directions for energy-related agricultural innovation.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Food & agricultural policy
Study type
Policy
Study design
Policy report
Source type
Grey literature
Status
Published
Geography
United States
System type
Other
Catalogue ID
BFmor3g4if-ggsxih

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.