Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Agricultural carbon footprint is farm specific: Case study of two organic farms

Cornelius Adewale, John P. Reganold, Stewart S. Higgins, R. Evans, Lynne Carpenter‐Boggs

Journal of Cleaner Production · 2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2019 case study examines carbon footprints on two organic farms, suggesting that environmental impact varies significantly based on farm-specific conditions rather than organic certification status alone. The research implies that generalised carbon accounting for organic systems may mask important operational differences. The findings contribute to more nuanced understanding of how farming decisions influence climate mitigation potential.

UK applicability

The case study approach and organic focus are relevant to UK farming contexts, though direct applicability depends on similarity of farm types, climate, and management practices. UK organic farms may benefit from site-specific carbon footprinting methodologies informed by this comparative approach.

Key measures

Agricultural carbon footprint (likely life cycle assessment or emissions intensity metrics); farm-specific management variables

Outcomes reported

The study measured and compared greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprints across two organic farms, demonstrating variation in environmental impact based on farm-specific management practices and characteristics.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Research
Study design
Field trial
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United States
System type
Organic systems
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.253
Catalogue ID
BFmor3g7fe-iigab9

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.