Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Achievable agricultural soil carbon sequestration across Europe from country‐specific estimates

Leonor Rodrigues, Brieuc Hardy, Bruno Huyghebeart, Julia Fohrafellner, Dario Fornara, Gabriela Barančíková, Téresa G. Bárcena, Maarten De Boever, Claudia Di Bene, Dalia Feizienė, Thomas Kätterer, Péter László, Lilian O’Sullivan, Daria Seitz, Jens Leifeld

Global Change Biology · 2021

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This systematic review evaluated the feasibility of the '4 per 1000' soil carbon sequestration initiative across 24 European countries by synthesising country-specific literature on achievable SCS measures. The authors found substantial geographic variation in SCS potential (0.1–27% of GHG compensation), with no country meeting the 4‰ annual target, and highlighted the critical need for methodological standardisation, improved data harmonisation, and integration of national/regional expertise in SCS accounting.

UK applicability

The study includes UK data within its pan-European analysis and suggests that country-specific knowledge and improved measurement approaches are essential; UK practitioners and policymakers should expect that national SCS estimates will differ substantially from pan-European models and require locally calibrated assessments of technical feasibility and trade-offs.

Key measures

Annual soil organic carbon (SOC) stock increase (percentage); agricultural GHG emissions offsetting potential (percentage range); country-specific SCS potential; tier ranking of SCS measurement approaches (tier 1–3)

Outcomes reported

The study evaluated country-specific soil carbon sequestration (SCS) potentials for 24 European countries, estimating that between 0.1% and 27% of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions could potentially be compensated annually through SCS measures. None of the countries' SCS potential reached the aspirational 4‰ annual increase goal of the 4 per 1000 initiative.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Systematic Review
Study design
Systematic review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Europe
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1111/gcb.15897
Catalogue ID
BFmor3g7yo-ck8hxe

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.