Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Land use-driven historical soil carbon losses in Swiss peatlands

Chloé Wüst‐Galley, Andreas Grünig, Jens Leifeld

Landscape Ecology · 2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This landscape ecology study examined the historical depletion of soil carbon in Swiss peatlands driven by land use conversion and intensification. The authors quantified carbon losses in peatland soils subjected to agricultural use, as suggested by analysis of soil carbon stocks across sites with documented land use change. The findings contribute to understanding the soil carbon legacy of peatland conversion in temperate Europe and have implications for carbon accounting and peatland restoration priorities.

UK applicability

Findings are directly applicable to UK peatlands, which similarly face historical carbon losses from agricultural conversion and drainage. UK peatland soils—particularly in Scotland, Northern England, and Wales—have experienced comparable land use-driven degradation, making the Swiss methodology and quantification approach relevant for UK soil carbon assessment and peatland policy.

Key measures

Soil carbon stocks, carbon losses over time, land use history, peatland soil carbon content

Outcomes reported

The study quantified historical soil carbon losses in Swiss peatlands resulting from changes in land use over time. It assessed the magnitude and drivers of carbon depletion in peatland soils converted to or managed under agricultural systems.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil carbon & organic matter
Study type
Research
Study design
Observational cohort
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Switzerland
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1007/s10980-019-00941-5
Catalogue ID
BFmor3g7yo-g2kjdm

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.