Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Effect of management and weather variations on the greenhouse gas budget of two grasslands during a 10-year experiment

Christof Ammann, A. Neftel, Markus Jocher, Jürg Fuhrer, Jens Leifeld

Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This long-term field study quantified the greenhouse gas budget of two contrasting grassland systems over a decade, integrating measurements of multiple greenhouse gases with data on management practices and climatic variability. As suggested by the title, the research documents how grassland management and weather patterns jointly influence net radiative forcing, contributing evidence on the climate impact of grassland production systems.

UK applicability

Findings from Swiss grassland systems may have moderate relevance to UK temperate grasslands, particularly in regions with similar management intensity and climate; however, direct applicability depends on how comparable the two grassland types studied are to UK pastoral systems, and on regional differences in soil, rainfall, and farming practice.

Key measures

Greenhouse gas fluxes (CO₂, CH₄, N₂O); net ecosystem productivity; management interventions; weather variables

Outcomes reported

The study measured the greenhouse gas budget (carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide emissions and uptake) of two grassland sites over a 10-year period, examining how management practices and inter-annual weather variations influenced net emissions.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Research
Study design
Field trial
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Switzerland
System type
Pasture-based livestock
DOI
10.1016/j.agee.2019.106814
Catalogue ID
BFmor3g7yo-i9szxw

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.