Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Negative emissions—Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis

Jan C. Minx, William F. Lamb, Max Callaghan, Sabine Fuss, Jérôme Hilaire, Felix Creutzig, Thorben Amann, Tim Beringer, Wagner de Oliveira Garcia, Jens Hartmann, Tarun Khanna, Dominic Lenzi, Gunnar Luderer, Gregory F. Nemet, Joeri Rogelj, Pete Smith, José Luis Vicente‐Vicente, Jennifer Wilcox, Maria del Mar Zamora Dominguez

Environmental Research Letters · 2018

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This comprehensive systematic review synthesises the global literature on negative emission technologies (NETs) to clarify their role in achieving Paris Agreement climate targets. The authors conclude that whilst portfolios of multiple NETs deployed at modest scales could support climate goals, a substantial gap exists between the NET deployment scales required in climate scenarios and current progress in innovation and deployment. The review identifies severe implementation barriers and weak policy incentives as major obstacles to scaling NETs in time to meet climate ambitions.

UK applicability

The findings are relevant to UK climate policy and the Net Zero commitments embedded in the Climate Change Act, particularly regarding the role of nature-based and technological NETs in meeting carbon budgets. However, the review's global scope means specific recommendations for UK implementation contexts—such as the feasibility of NETs in UK agricultural and industrial systems—would require further tailoring.

Key measures

Literature synthesis on NET deployment potential, economic and biophysical limits, innovation progress, policy incentives, and ethical frameworks across 1.5°C and 2°C warming scenarios

Outcomes reported

The study synthesised literature on negative emission technologies (NETs) using scientometric tools and in-depth assessment to clarify their role in climate mitigation scenarios, ethical implications, and deployment challenges. It identified six major findings regarding NET deployment requirements, potentials, scalability constraints, and implementation barriers across different warming scenarios.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Systematic Review
Study design
Systematic review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Other
DOI
10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9b
Catalogue ID
BFmor3g9dg-rvj9xy

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.