Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Matching policy and science: Rationale for the ‘4 per 1000 - soils for food security and climate’ initiative

Jean‐François Soussana, Suzanne Lutfalla, Fiona Ehrhardt, Todd S. Rosenstock, Christine Lamanna, Peter Havlík, Meryl Richards, Eva Wollenberg, Jean‐Luc Chotte, Emmanuel Torquebiau, Philippe Ciais, Pete Smith, Rattan Lal

Soil and Tillage Research · 2017

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper outlines the scientific basis for the '4 per 1000 - soils for food security and climate' initiative, a policy framework proposed to simultaneously address climate change and food security through increased soil organic carbon stocks. The authors, a multidisciplinary consortium, argue that a 0.4% annual increase in soil carbon could offset global CO₂ emissions while enhancing agricultural productivity and resilience. The work bridges peer-reviewed evidence with policy objectives, though the feasibility and regional variability of achieving this target across diverse farming systems remain subjects for further investigation.

UK applicability

The initiative's principles are relevant to UK agricultural policy and carbon accounting frameworks, particularly in the context of post-Brexit agricultural support schemes and Net Zero commitments. UK temperate grasslands, arable soils, and conservation agriculture practices offer potential pathways for soil carbon enhancement, though regional soil types, climate, and management intensity will determine realistic sequestration rates.

Key measures

Soil organic carbon sequestration rates; annual carbon accumulation targets; food security implications; climate mitigation potential

Outcomes reported

The paper articulates the scientific rationale underpinning the '4 per 1000' initiative, which proposes increasing soil organic carbon stocks by 0.4% annually to offset atmospheric CO₂ emissions and enhance food security. It examines how agricultural and soil management practices can contribute to both climate change mitigation and improved productive capacity.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Soil carbon & organic matter
Study type
Policy
Study design
Policy report
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1016/j.still.2017.12.002
Catalogue ID
BFmor3g9dg-xwni38

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.