Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryIndustry / policy report

Scientific outcome of the IPBES-IPCC co-sponsored workshop on biodiversity and climate change

Hans Otto-Portner, Bob Scholes, John Agard, Emma Archer, Almut Arneth, Xuemei Bai, David K. A. Barnes, Michael T. Burrows, Lung S. Chan, Wai Lung Cheung, Sarah E. Diamond, Camila I. Donatti, Carlos M. Duarte, Nico Eisenhauer, Wendy Foden, Maria A. Gasalla, Collins Handa, Thomas Hickler, Ove Hoegh‐Guldberg, Kazuhito Ichii, Ute Jacob, Gregory Insarov, Wolfgang Kiessling, Paul Leadley, Rik Leemans, Lisa A. Levin, Michelle Lim, Shobha Maharaj, Shunsuke Managi, Pablo A. Marquet, Pamela McElwee, Guy F. Midgley, Thierry Oberdorff, David Obura, Balgis Osman Elasha, Ram Pandit, Unai Pascual, Aliny P. F. Pires, Alexander Popp, Victòria Reyes-García, Mahesh Sankaran, Josef Settele, Yunne‐Jai Shin, Sintayehu W. Dejene, Pete Smith, Nadja Steiner, Bernardo B. N. Strassburg, Raman Sukumar, Christopher H. Trisos, Adalberto Luís Val, Jianguo Wu, Edvin Aldrian, Camille Parmesan, Ramón Pichs-Madruga, Debra Roberts, Alex D. Rogers, Sandra Dı́az, Markus Fischer, Shizuka Hashimoto, Sandra Lavorel, Ning Wu, Hien T. Ngo

2021

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This Scientific Outcome document represents the consensus findings from the first joint IPCC-IPBES workshop (December 2020) on the interconnected challenges of climate change and biodiversity loss. The report synthesises evidence across seven sections to inform policy decisions and identify research priorities, situated within global commitments including the Paris Agreement, post-2020 biodiversity framework, and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. It formalises the scientific rationale for integrated climate and biodiversity action as essential to human well-being.

UK applicability

As a foundational international policy brief endorsed by both IPCC and IPBES, the report's conclusions are directly relevant to UK climate and nature policy implementation, particularly the Environment Act 2021 and related biodiversity targets. The identified knowledge gaps and action options inform UK research priorities and nature-based solutions strategies.

Key measures

State of knowledge synthesis on climate-biodiversity interactions; identification of policy options and research gaps

Outcomes reported

The report synthesises emerging knowledge on the interactions between climate change and biodiversity loss, and identifies options for integrated action and knowledge gaps. It aims to inform decision-making across the dual crises of climate and biodiversity within the context of international agreements including the Paris Agreement and post-2020 biodiversity framework.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Policy
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Policy report
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Other
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.4923212
Catalogue ID
BFmor3g9dh-5nf1w1

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.