Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Options of partners improve carbon for phosphorus trade in the arbuscular mycorrhizal mutualism

Alicia Argüello, Michael J. O’Brien, Marcel G. A. van der Heijden, Andres Wiemken, Bernhard Schmid, Pascal A. Niklaus

Ecology Letters · 2016

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This experimental study demonstrates that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity enhances the fairness of resource exchange in plant-fungal mutualisms. By presenting plants with two AMF species differing in cooperativeness, researchers found that plants preferentially rewarded more cooperative partners with greater carbon allocation whilst extracting more phosphorus from less cooperative fungi when alternatives existed. The findings suggest that partner choice and competition among fungal partners is an evolutionary mechanism maintaining both the persistence and diversity of the ancient plant-AMF symbiosis.

UK applicability

Whilst the findings are laboratory-based rather than field-validated, they have theoretical relevance to UK agriculture and horticulture, where managing soil microbial diversity to enhance nutrient acquisition efficiency could reduce phosphorus fertiliser inputs. Further research would be needed to establish whether these partner-choice mechanisms operate effectively in complex UK field soils with multiple resident AMF communities.

Key measures

³³P uptake from individual AMF partners; ¹⁴C allocation to individual AMF partners; carbon cost per unit phosphorus transferred

Outcomes reported

The study measured phosphorus (³³P) and carbon (¹⁴C) allocation between plants and two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species that differed in cooperativeness, using a split-root experimental system. Plants received more phosphorus from less cooperative fungi when an alternative fungal partner was available, resulting in reduced carbon cost per unit of phosphorus from the less cooperative partner.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil biology & microbiology
Study type
Research
Study design
Laboratory controlled experiment
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Switzerland
System type
Laboratory / in vitro
DOI
10.1111/ele.12601
Catalogue ID
BFmor3gc43-osuum1

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.