Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Research meetings must be more sustainable

Alberto Sanz-Cobeña, Roberta Alessandrini, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Marco Springmann, Eduardo Aguilera, Barbara Amon, Fabio Bartolini, Markus Geupel, Bruna Grizzetti, Susanna Kugelberg, Catharina Latka, Liang Xia, Anna Birgitte Milford, Patrick Musinguzi, Ee Ling Ng, Helen Suter, Adrian Leip

Nature Food · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This commentary, authored by a prominent international group of agricultural and food systems researchers, argues that research meetings in the sector must adopt more sustainable practices. Published in Nature Food in 2020, the piece likely addresses the carbon footprint and environmental impact of academic conferences, proposing standards or behavioural changes to align research community practices with the sustainability principles those researchers advocate in their work.

UK applicability

Directly applicable to UK-based agricultural and food systems research institutions, universities, and research councils (BBSRC, NERC) that organise or fund conference attendance. The recommendations would inform UK research governance and institutional sustainability policies.

Key measures

As suggested by the title, likely carbon footprint, travel-related emissions, or sustainability metrics of conference organisation

Outcomes reported

The paper likely examines the environmental footprint and sustainability practices of research conferences and meetings within the agricultural and food systems research community. It presumably advocates for or assesses mechanisms to reduce the ecological impact of academic gatherings.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Food & agricultural policy
Study type
Commentary
Study design
Commentary
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Food supply chain
DOI
10.1038/s43016-020-0065-2
Catalogue ID
BFmor3ggd1-6auon6

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.