Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Long-term Effects of Biosolids on Soil Quality and Fertility

F. A. Nicholson, Anne Bhogal, Matt Taylor, S. P. McGrath, Paul J. A. Withers

Soil Science · 2018

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This long-term field study evaluated the impacts of recycling three types of digested biosolids to agricultural land across four English sites with contrasting soils over a 20-year period (1994–2014). Biosolids application significantly increased soil organic matter (10–17%), available water capacity (up to 10%), soil nitrogen (up to 20%), extractable phosphorus (up to 48%), total sulphur (up to 30%), and earthworm populations (approximately doubled), with no observed adverse effects on crop quality. The findings support biosolids recycling as a sustainable practice for maintaining soil fertility and organic matter in UK agriculture.

UK applicability

These results are directly applicable to UK agricultural practice and policy, as the study was conducted across representative English soil types and agroclimatic zones over two decades. The evidence supports the continuation and expansion of biosolids recycling schemes as part of UK sustainable soil and nutrient management strategies.

Key measures

Soil organic matter (% increase), light-fraction SOM (mg kg⁻¹), available water capacity (%), water infiltration rate, aggregate stability, total nitrogen (%), extractable phosphorus (%), total sulphur (%), earthworm numbers and biomass (relative to control), crop quality

Outcomes reported

The study quantified changes in soil physical, chemical, and biological properties after 20 years of biosolids recycling at rates of 2.9–3.4 t ha⁻¹ y⁻¹ across four contrasting English soil types. Measured outcomes included soil organic matter, nutrient content, water capacity, infiltration, aggregate stability, and earthworm populations.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil fertility & nutrient management
Study type
Research
Study design
Field trial
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United Kingdom
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1097/ss.0000000000000239
Catalogue ID
BFmou2m5p8-egzzh8

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.