Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Organic farming promotes biotic resistance to foodborne human pathogens

Matthew S. Jones, Zhen Fu, John P. Reganold, Daniel S. Karp, Thomas E. Besser, Jason M. Tylianakis, William E. Snyder

Journal of Applied Ecology · 2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This field and laboratory study demonstrates that organic farming practices foster greater diversity and activity among coprophagous beetles and soil bacteria compared to conventional farming on vegetable fields in the US west. The research suggests that these enhanced coprophage communities are significantly more effective at suppressing human-pathogenic E. coli O157:H7, linking farm management practices, biodiversity conservation, and food safety outcomes. The findings challenge the assumption that diverse farmlands inherently increase pathogen contamination risk, and instead propose that farm simplification may elevate pathogenic contamination likelihood.

UK applicability

The findings are relevant to UK vegetable production systems, though applicability may be influenced by differences in climate, soil types, and the specific coprophage fauna present in UK agroecosystems. UK policy frameworks promoting organic production and environmental stewardship on farms could reference these data as evidence that biodiversity-supporting practices support food safety alongside ecological benefits.

Key measures

Above-ground dung beetle species richness and faeces removal rates; below-ground soil bacterial biodiversity; laboratory suppression of E. coli O157:H7 by farm-derived coprophage communities

Outcomes reported

The study measured coprophage (dung beetle and soil bacterial) diversity and activity on 70 commercial vegetable fields across the US west coast under organic versus conventional management, and assessed their capacity to suppress human-pathogenic E. coli O157:H7 in laboratory experiments.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil biology & microbiology
Study type
Research
Study design
Field survey with complementary laboratory experiments
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United States
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1111/1365-2664.13365
Catalogue ID
BFmou2mc8b-94bcmt

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.