Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

The role of soil carbon in natural climate solutions

Déborah Bossio, Susan C. Cook‐Patton, Peter W. Ellis, Joseph Fargione, Jonathan Sanderman, Pete Smith, Stephen A. Wood, Robert J. Zomer, M. Unger, I.M. Emmer, Bronson W. Griscom

Nature Sustainability · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2020 systematic review in Nature Sustainability examines global evidence on soil carbon sequestration within natural climate solutions, synthesising sequestration rates and scalability potential across diverse agricultural management practices and farming systems. The authors assess co-benefits and constraints of soil-based climate mitigation, contextualising soil carbon enhancement within the broader climate intervention portfolio. The analysis acknowledges both technical potential and practical limits of soil carbon approaches as a climate strategy.

UK applicability

The review's findings on temperate grassland and arable systems are directly relevant to UK farming. UK policy frameworks (e.g. Environmental Land Management schemes) increasingly rely on soil carbon enhancement; this systematic evidence helps calibrate realistic sequestration targets and identify management practices suited to British conditions and soil types.

Key measures

Soil carbon sequestration rates; sequestration potential (Gt CO₂e per year); scalability across regions and farming systems; co-benefits (e.g. productivity, resilience); costs and constraints

Outcomes reported

The study synthesised global evidence on soil carbon sequestration rates, scalability potential, and co-benefits across diverse agricultural management practices and farming systems. It assessed the role of soil-based approaches within the broader portfolio of natural climate solutions and identified technical potential alongside practical constraints.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Systematic Review
Study design
Systematic review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1038/s41893-020-0491-z
Catalogue ID
BFmou2mefv-1k6nzt

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.