Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Negative emissions—Part 3: Innovation and upscaling

Gregory F. Nemet, Max Callaghan, Felix Creutzig, Sabine Fuss, Jens Hartmann, Jérôme Hilaire, William F. Lamb, Jan C. Minx, Sophia Rogers, Pete Smith

Environmental Research Letters · 2018

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This systematic review of the innovation literature on negative emissions technologies reveals a substantial imbalance in research effort, with 59% of articles focused on early-stage R&D and 83% emphasising supply-side over demand-side considerations. The analysis highlights critical gaps in understanding user heterogeneity, policy risk management, and public acceptance—factors essential for successful technology diffusion—whilst integrated assessment models suggest the major deployment window is 2030–2050, creating an urgent but underappreciated challenge for NET adoption at scale.

UK applicability

The UK's Net Zero commitments and reliance on NETs in decarbonisation scenarios necessitate urgent attention to the demand-side and deployment barriers identified in this review. The findings suggest UK policy and industry should prioritise innovation in public engagement, business model development, and regulatory frameworks for NETs, particularly BECCS, rather than concentrating solely on technical R&D.

Key measures

Proportion of literature focused on each innovation stage (R&D, demonstrations, scale-up, demand-side activities); supply-side vs. demand-side emphasis (83% vs. 17%); technology type distribution; timeline for deployment scenarios in integrated assessment models

Outcomes reported

The study assessed the literature on innovation and upscaling for negative emissions technologies (NETs) using systematic literature coding across innovation process stages. It quantified the distribution of research effort across R&D, demonstrations, scale-up, demand-pull, niche markets, and public acceptance phases.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Systematic Review
Study design
Systematic review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Food supply chain
DOI
10.1088/1748-9326/aabff4
Catalogue ID
BFmou2mefv-95lqyc

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.