Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryIndustry / policy report

Scientific outcome of the IPBES-IPCC co-sponsored workshop on biodiversity and climate change

Hans Otto-Portner, Bob Scholes, John Agard, Emma Archer, Almut Arneth, Xuemei Bai, David K. A. Barnes, Michael T. Burrows, Lung S. Chan, Wai Lung Cheung, Sarah E. Diamond, Camila I. Donatti, Carlos M. Duarte, Nico Eisenhauer, Wendy Foden, Maria A. Gasalla, Collins Handa, Thomas Hickler, Ove Hoegh‐Guldberg, Kazuhito Ichii, Ute Jacob, Gregory Insarov, Wolfgang Kiessling, Paul Leadley, Rik Leemans, Lisa A. Levin, Michelle Lim, Shobha Maharaj, Shunsuke Managi, Pablo A. Marquet, Pamela McElwee, Guy F. Midgley, Thierry Oberdorff, David Obura, Balgis Osman Elasha, Ram Pandit, Unai Pascual, Aliny P. F. Pires, Alexander Popp, Victòria Reyes-García, Mahesh Sankaran, Josef Settele, Yunne‐Jai Shin, Sintayehu W. Dejene, Pete Smith, Nadja Steiner, Bernardo B. N. Strassburg, Raman Sukumar, Christopher H. Trisos, Adalberto Luís Val, Jianguo Wu, Edvin Aldrian, Camille Parmesan, Ramón Pichs-Madruga, Debra Roberts, Alex D. Rogers, Sandra Dı́az, Markus Fischer, Shizuka Hashimoto, Sandra Lavorel, Ning Wu, Hien T. Ngo

2021

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This scientific outcome document, produced by the first joint IPCC-IPBES workshop in December 2020, synthesises the state of knowledge on climate change and biodiversity loss as interconnected crises affecting human well-being. The report contextualises findings within major international agreements (Paris Agreement, post-2020 biodiversity framework, Sendai Framework, 2030 Agenda) and provides evidence-based options for integrated action whilst identifying critical research gaps. The work represents an unprecedented collaboration between two major assessment bodies to inform policy and decision-making on dual environmental challenges.

UK applicability

The report's integrated assessment framework and policy recommendations are directly applicable to UK climate and biodiversity strategies, particularly the Environment Act 2021 and emerging Nature Recovery Networks. The identification of knowledge gaps and research priorities may guide UK research funding and policy development on nature-based solutions to climate change.

Key measures

Qualitative assessment of state of knowledge on climate-biodiversity interactions; identification of policy options and knowledge gaps

Outcomes reported

The report synthesises emerging knowledge on the interconnections between climate change and biodiversity loss, and identifies policy options and actions to address both crises simultaneously. It highlights knowledge gaps requiring further scientific research to inform decision-making across multiple governance frameworks.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Policy report
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Other
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.4923212
Catalogue ID
BFmou2mefv-lt0i3w

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.