Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Land‐based measures to mitigate climate change: Potential and feasibility by country

Stephanie Roe, Charlotte Streck, Robert Beach, Jonah Busch, Melissa Chapman, Vassilis Daioglou, Андре Депперманн, Jonathan Doelman, Jeremy Emmet‐Booth, Jens Engelmann, Oliver Fricko, Chad Frischmann, Jason Funk, Giacomo Grassi, Bronson W. Griscom, Peter Havlík, Steef V. Hanssen, Florian Humpenöder, David M. Landholm, Guy Lomax, Johannes Lehmann, Leah Mesnildrey, G.J. Nabuurs, Alexander Popp, Charlotte Rivard, Jonathan Sanderman, Brent Sohngen, Pete Smith, Elke Stehfest, Dominic Woolf, Deborah Lawrence

Global Change Biology · 2021

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This comprehensive global assessment quantifies land-based climate mitigation opportunities across 20 measures in over 200 countries, identifying 8–13.8 GtCO₂ eq yr⁻¹ of cost-effective potential by 2050 aligned with a 1.5°C pathway. The analysis reveals substantial regional and country variation, with forests and ecosystems protection offering particularly high mitigation efficiency and co-benefits at lower cost. The study highlights that 80% of feasible potential lies in developing countries and least-developed countries, where governance, investment, and socio-cultural conditions present the greatest implementation barriers.

UK applicability

The UK represents one of the developed economies within the assessed regions; whilst the study's global focus and emphasis on developing-country feasibility may have limited direct application to UK policy, the identified measures (particularly forest protection and demand-side approaches) are relevant to UK climate strategy. The findings on governance and economic investment requirements inform UK international climate finance and land-use policy decisions.

Key measures

Cost-effective mitigation potential (GtCO₂ eq yr⁻¹), technical potential, mitigation efficiency, co-benefits provision, implementation costs ($/tCO₂ eq), feasibility barriers (governance, economic investment, socio-cultural factors)

Outcomes reported

The study quantified cost-effective land-based climate mitigation potential at 8–13.8 GtCO₂ eq yr⁻¹ between 2020 and 2050 across 20 measures in >200 countries, and assessed country-level implementation feasibility. It compared bottom-up sectoral estimates with integrated assessment models and evaluated the contribution of forests, agriculture, and demand-side measures.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Policy
Study design
Policy report
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1111/gcb.15873
Catalogue ID
BFmou2mefv-u8lx6b

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.