Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

An Underground Revolution: Biodiversity and Soil Ecological Engineering for Agricultural Sustainability

S. Franz Bender, Cameron Wagg, Marcel G. A. van der Heijden

Trends in Ecology & Evolution · 2016

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2016 review paper argues that soil biodiversity is a central driver of agricultural sustainability and that deliberate management of soil biological communities represents a viable pathway to reconcile intensification with ecosystem health. The authors present soil ecological engineering—via practices such as crop rotation, reduced tillage, and organic amendments—as a mechanism to enhance multiple ecosystem functions whilst maintaining productive capacity. The paper positions underground biodiversity as key to addressing the intensification–sustainability trade-off in modern farming systems.

UK applicability

The findings are directly applicable to UK agriculture, where soil degradation and biodiversity loss are significant concerns in both arable and grassland systems. UK policy frameworks (including the Environmental Land Management schemes) increasingly emphasize soil health and biodiversity, making this review's evidence base relevant to contemporary farm practice and subsidy design.

Key measures

Soil biodiversity indices; ecosystem services (nutrient cycling, water retention, disease suppression); crop yield; soil carbon; microbial and faunal community composition

Outcomes reported

The review synthesised evidence on how deliberate management of soil biological communities—through practices such as crop rotation, reduced tillage, and organic inputs—enhances multiple ecosystem functions whilst maintaining or improving agricultural productivity. The paper evaluated soil ecological engineering as a pathway to reconcile agricultural intensification with ecosystem health and sustainability.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil biology & microbiology
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.016
Catalogue ID
BFmou2mhmp-0fq3ks

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.