Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Bundling measures for food systems transformation: a global, multimodel assessment

Marina Sundiang, Thais Diniz Oliveira, Daniel Mason-D’Croz, Matthew Gibson, Felicitas Beier, Lauren Benavidez, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Astrid Bos, Maksym Chepeliev, David M. Chen, Thijs de Lange, Jonathan Doelman, Shahnila Dunston, Stefan Frank, Shinichiro Fujimori, Tomoko Hasegawa, Peter Havlík, Jordan Hristov, Jonas Jägermeyr, Marta Kozicka, Marijke Kuiper, Page Kyle, Hermann Lotze‐Campen, Hermen Luchtenbelt, Abhijeet Mishra, Christoph Müller, Gerald C. Nelson, Amanda Palazzo, Ignácio Pérez Domínguez, Alexander Popp, Ronald D. Sands, Marco Springmann, Elke Stehfest, Timothy B. Sulser, Kiyoshi Takahashi, Gianmaria Tassinari, Ferike Thom, Philip K. Thornton, Kazuaki Tsuchiya, Willem‐Jan van Zeist, Hans van Meijl, Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, Detlef P. van Vuuren, H.H.E. van Zanten, Isabelle Weindl, Keith Wiebe, Xin Zhao, Mario Herrero

The Lancet Planetary Health · 2025

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This multimodel assessment evaluated the potential of four transformative food systems measures—increased agricultural productivity, halved food loss and waste, dietary shifts towards the EAT-Lancet healthy reference diet, and economy-wide climate mitigation aligned with 1·5°C warming limits—both individually and in combination through 2050. Using an ensemble of ten state-of-the-art global economic models and a decomposition framework, the study quantified the magnitude, uncertainty, and interactions between these measures to identify complementarities and trade-offs. The findings indicate that bundling these measures yields significant reductions in emissions and agricultural land use, with the analysis revealing important synergies and trade-offs when multiple interventions are implemented simultaneously.

UK applicability

The study's global multimodel framework provides evidence on food systems transformation pathways relevant to UK policy objectives around net-zero agriculture, sustainable diets, and food security. However, as a global assessment using middle-of-the-road socioeconomic assumptions, it requires contextualisation to UK-specific conditions, agricultural structure, dietary patterns, and climate mitigation targets to inform domestic policy implementation.

Key measures

Greenhouse gas emissions reduction, agricultural land use change (percentage points), food security (hunger risk), and interaction effects between bundled measures

Outcomes reported

The study quantified the individual and combined impacts of four key food systems transformation measures (agricultural productivity increases, food loss and waste reduction, dietary shifts towards healthier patterns, and climate mitigation policies) on hunger, environmental sustainability, emissions, and agricultural land use through 2050 using an ensemble of ten global economic models.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Food security & global nutrition
Study type
Research
Study design
Multimodel assessment with decomposition analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Food supply chain
DOI
10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101339
Catalogue ID
BFmou2mlz8-hzipcs

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.