Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Loss of soil organic carbon in Swiss long-term agricultural experiments over a wide range of management practices

Sonja G. Keel, Thomas Anken, Lucie Büchi, Andreas Chervet, Andreas Fließbach, René Flisch, Olivier Huguenin‐Elie, Paul Mäder, Jochen Mayer, Sokrat Sinaj, Wolfgang G. Sturny, Chloé Wüst‐Galley, U. Zihlmann, Jens Leifeld

Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · 2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This synthesis consolidates data from multiple long-term Swiss agricultural field experiments to document widespread soil organic carbon decline across diverse farming systems, from intensive to organic management. The work quantifies SOC losses and identifies drivers of carbon loss in temperate European agriculture, highlighting the persistence of this challenge regardless of management approach intensity. The findings suggest that current practices across the Swiss farming spectrum are insufficient to maintain or build soil carbon stocks.

UK applicability

The findings are directly relevant to UK agriculture, which operates under similar temperate climatic and soil conditions and faces comparable SOC depletion pressures. The breadth of Swiss management systems studied (varying in intensity, mechanisation, and input use) provides empirical context applicable to UK policy on soil carbon and sustainable intensification.

Key measures

Soil organic carbon concentration and stock; management practice variables; temporal SOC change across multiple experimental sites

Outcomes reported

The study quantified soil organic carbon (SOC) losses across multiple long-term field experiments in Switzerland spanning a range of management intensities and approaches. The analysis identified factors influencing carbon persistence and vulnerability under current European temperate farming practices.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil carbon & organic matter
Study type
Research
Study design
Field trial synthesis / Meta-analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Switzerland
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1016/j.agee.2019.106654
Catalogue ID
BFmovbmg6s-0az6e4

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.