Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Amount and stability of recent and aged plant residues in degrading peatland soils

Cédric Bader, Moritz Müller, Rainer Schulin, Jens Leifeld

Soil Biology and Biochemistry · 2017

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2017 study by Bader and colleagues characterised how plant residue dynamics shift in degrading peatland soils, comparing the quantity and stability of recent organic inputs against aged soil carbon pools. The work suggests that soil degradation—likely through drainage or land-use change—alters the resistance of plant-derived organic matter to decomposition. The findings contribute to understanding peatland carbon cycling under anthropogenic stress and inform predictions of soil carbon loss following peatland management change.

UK applicability

Findings are directly applicable to UK lowland peatland management, particularly in regions where drainage and agricultural intensification have degraded peat soils. Results may inform UK peatland restoration strategies and soil carbon accounting under current and future land-use scenarios.

Key measures

Quantity and stability of recent plant residues; aged soil carbon pools; decomposition resistance; organic matter composition in degraded versus reference peatland soils

Outcomes reported

The study quantified and characterised the amount and resistance to decomposition of recent versus aged plant residues in peatland soils undergoing degradation. It examined how soil degradation alters the stability of plant-derived organic matter pools.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil carbon & organic matter
Study type
Research
Study design
Field trial
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Europe
System type
Other
DOI
10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.01.029
Catalogue ID
BFmovbmg6s-dx2di1

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.