Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

The 4p1000 initiative: Opportunities, limitations and challenges for implementing soil organic carbon sequestration as a sustainable development strategy

Cornélia Rumpel, Farshad Amiraslani, Claire Chenu, Magali García Cárdenas, Martin Kaonga, Lydie‐Stella Koutika, J. K. Ladha, B. E. Madari, Yasuhito Shirato, Pete Smith, Brahim Soudi, Jean‐François Soussana, David Whitehead, Eva Wollenberg

AMBIO · 2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2019 international review examines the 4p1000 initiative—a proposal to increase global soil organic carbon stocks by 0.4% annually—as a potential mechanism for climate mitigation and sustainable development. The authors synthesise evidence across diverse farming systems and regions on the agronomic, environmental and socio-economic opportunities and constraints for SOC sequestration, presenting a nuanced assessment of both the initiative's potential and its realistic limitations for implementation.

Regional applicability

The review's findings on SOC sequestration feasibility, agronomic trade-offs and policy enablers are relevant to UK farming systems and climate targets. However, UK-specific climate, soil type and socio-economic contexts would require localised assessment of sequestration potential and the practical and financial incentives needed to motivate farmer adoption.

Key measures

Soil organic carbon stocks and sequestration rates; agronomic feasibility; environmental co-benefits; socio-economic constraints and opportunities across farming systems and regions

Outcomes reported

The study assessed opportunities, limitations and challenges for implementing soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration through the 4p1000 initiative framework across diverse farming systems and regions. It synthesised evidence on agronomic, environmental and socio-economic factors affecting the feasibility of achieving 0.4% annual increases in global soil organic carbon stocks.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1007/s13280-019-01165-2
Catalogue ID
BFmovbmhmv-m78mhg

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.