Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

The carbon sequestration potential of terrestrial ecosystems

Rattan Lal, Pete Smith, Hermann F. Jungkunst, William J. Mitsch, Johannes Lehmann, P. K. R. Nair, Alex B. McBratney, João Carlos de Moraes Sá, J. Schneider, Yuri Lopes Zinn, Alba Lucia Araujo Skorupa, Hai‐Lin Zhang, Budiman Minasny, Cherukumalli Srinivasrao, N. H. Ravindranath

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation · 2018

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This review synthesises evidence on the carbon sequestration potential of terrestrial ecosystems, documenting substantial historical losses of soil and vegetation carbon stocks following agricultural conversion circa 8000 BC. The authors argue that recarbonisation of degraded terrestrial biosphere—particularly soil organic carbon restoration—represents a critical strategy for climate change mitigation whilst enhancing ecosystem services. The work positions soil carbon dynamics at the intersection of climate action and land management.

UK applicability

UK arable and grassland soils have undergone significant organic matter depletion since industrialisation; the recarbonisation principles outlined are directly applicable to UK farming policy and soil health initiatives, particularly in the context of the Environmental Land Management schemes and net-zero commitments.

Key measures

Soil organic carbon (SOC) stock depletion (Pg; megatonnes); terrestrial carbon stock depletion; greenhouse gas emissions (CO₂, CH₄, N₂O); radiative forcing

Outcomes reported

The paper quantifies historical depletion of soil organic carbon stocks (130–135 Pg since agriculture's onset) and discusses recarbonisation of terrestrial ecosystems as a mitigation strategy for anthropogenic climate change. It examines the role of soil and vegetation carbon stocks in moderating atmospheric CO₂ concentrations.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.2489/jswc.73.6.145a
Catalogue ID
BFmovbmhmv-nw0x1m

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.