Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Research meetings must be more sustainable

Alberto Sanz-Cobeña, Roberta Alessandrini, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Marco Springmann, Eduardo Aguilera, Barbara Amon, Fabio Bartolini, Markus Geupel, Bruna Grizzetti, Susanna Kugelberg, Catharina Latka, Liang Xia, Anna Birgitte Milford, Patrick Musinguzi, Ee Ling Ng, Helen Suter, Adrian Leip

Nature Food · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2020 commentary in Nature Food, authored by an international consortium of agricultural and food systems researchers, calls for greater sustainability in the organisation and conduct of research meetings and conferences. The authors argue that the research community must examine and reduce the environmental impact of its own practices, positioning institutional and behavioural change in how conferences are held as a legitimate policy and governance concern. The paper contributes to broader discourse on the responsibility of the research enterprise to align its operational practices with its stated environmental and sustainability goals.

UK applicability

UK agricultural research institutions and learned societies could apply these findings to review the carbon footprint of their own conference and meeting practices, and to develop institutional policies supporting lower-impact alternatives such as hybrid or virtual meetings. The arguments are directly relevant to UK research governance and the alignment of research institution practices with net-zero commitments.

Key measures

Not specified in available metadata; likely carbon emissions, travel intensity, or environmental impact metrics of conferences (inferred from title)

Outcomes reported

The paper advocates for systemic changes to how agricultural research meetings are organised and conducted to reduce their environmental footprint. As suggested by the title, the work examines the carbon intensity and sustainability practices of the research enterprise itself rather than agricultural production systems.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Food & agricultural policy
Study type
Commentary
Study design
Commentary
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Other
DOI
10.1038/s43016-020-0065-2
Catalogue ID
BFmovbmp89-ycnaum

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.