Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Bundling measures for food systems transformation: a global, multimodel assessment

Marina Sundiang, Thais Diniz Oliveira, Daniel Mason-D’Croz, Matthew Gibson, Felicitas Beier, Lauren Benavidez, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Astrid Bos, Maksym Chepeliev, David M. Chen, Thijs de Lange, Jonathan Doelman, Shahnila Dunston, Stefan Frank, Shinichiro Fujimori, Tomoko Hasegawa, Peter Havlík, Jordan Hristov, Jonas Jägermeyr, Marta Kozicka, Marijke Kuiper, Page Kyle, Hermann Lotze‐Campen, Hermen Luchtenbelt, Abhijeet Mishra, Christoph Müller, Gerald C. Nelson, Amanda Palazzo, Ignácio Pérez Domínguez, Alexander Popp, Ronald D. Sands, Marco Springmann, Elke Stehfest, Timothy B. Sulser, Kiyoshi Takahashi, Gianmaria Tassinari, Ferike Thom, Philip K. Thornton, Kazuaki Tsuchiya, Willem‐Jan van Zeist, Hans van Meijl, Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, Detlef P. van Vuuren, H.H.E. van Zanten, Isabelle Weindl, Keith Wiebe, Xin Zhao, Mario Herrero

The Lancet Planetary Health · 2025

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This global multimodel assessment applied ten state-of-the-art economic models to evaluate four key transformation measures for food systems: increased agricultural productivity, halved food loss and waste, dietary shifts towards healthier patterns (EAT-Lancet aligned), and economy-wide climate mitigation aligned with 1.5°C warming limits. The study examined these measures both in isolation and as a bundled scenario from 2020 to 2050, with decomposition analysis revealing complementarities and trade-offs that emerge when multiple interventions are implemented simultaneously. The findings suggest that bundled approaches offer synergistic potential for addressing hunger risk, environmental sustainability, and planetary health, though specific quantitative outcomes were truncated in the available abstract.

UK applicability

The study's global modelling framework and emphasis on bundled policy measures are relevant to UK food systems strategy, particularly for aligning with Net Zero 2050 targets and the Food Security Report requirements. However, the results are driven by middle-of-the-road socioeconomic pathways and may require downscaling and localisation to reflect UK agricultural capacity, dietary baselines, and policy instruments.

Key measures

Greenhouse gas emissions reductions, agricultural land use changes, food security impacts, dietary alignment with EAT-Lancet reference diet, economic outcomes modelled across ten global economic models

Outcomes reported

The study quantified the magnitude and uncertainty of impacts from four key food systems transformation measures (agricultural productivity, food loss and waste reduction, dietary shifts towards healthier patterns, and climate mitigation policies) both individually and in combination across 2020–2050. It assessed complementarities and trade-offs between measures through decomposition analysis distinguishing individual, total, and interaction effects.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Food & agricultural policy
Study type
Research
Study design
Policy report
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Food supply chain
DOI
10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101339
Catalogue ID
BFmovbmp8a-k7usts

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.