Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Global Carbon Budget 2016

Corinne Le Quéré, Robbie M. Andrew, Josep G. Canadell, Stephen Sitch, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Glen P. Peters, Andrew C. Manning, Thomas A. Boden, Pieter P. Tans, R. A. Houghton, Ralph F. Keeling, Simone R. Alin, Oliver Andrews, Peter Anthoni, Leticia Barbero, Laurent Bopp, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise Chini, Philippe Ciais, Kim Currie, Christine Delire, Scott C. Doney, Pierre Friedlingstein, Thanos Gkritzalis, Ian Harris, Judith Hauck, Vanessa Haverd, Mario Hoppema, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Atul K. Jain, Etsushi Kato, Arne Körtzinger, Peter Landschützer, Nathalie Lefèvre, Andrew Lenton, Sebastian Lienert, Danica Lombardozzi, Joe R. Melton, Nicolas Metzl, Frank J. Millero, Pedro M. S. Monteiro, David R. Munro, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Shin‐Ichiro Nakaoka, Kevin O’Brien, Are Olsen, Abdirahman M Omar, Tsuneo Ono, Denis Pierrot, Benjamin Poulter, Christian Rödenbeck, Joe Salisbury, Ute Schuster, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Ingunn Skjelvan, Benjamin D. Stocker, Adrienne J. Sutton, Taro Takahashi, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Guido R. van der Werf, Nicolas Viovy, Anthony P. Walker, A. Wiltshire, Sönke Zaehle

Earth system science data · 2016

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This comprehensive assessment of the global carbon budget provides an integrated quantification of anthropogenic CO2 emissions and their partitioning among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere for 2006–2015. The work synthesises disparate data streams—including energy and industrial statistics, land-cover change observations, fire activity records, and ocean and vegetation models—to characterise all major budget components with explicit uncertainty estimates. The study supports climate policy development and climate projection by documenting methodology, data limitations, and consistency checks across independent approaches.

UK applicability

The global carbon budget framework and methodologies described have direct relevance to UK greenhouse gas accounting and carbon sequestration policy, particularly regarding land-use change emissions and terrestrial carbon sink assessment. UK-specific carbon budgets and Climate Change Act targets depend on accurate quantification of the terrestrial and ocean sinks documented here, though the paper does not disaggregate regional or sectoral contributions.

Key measures

Annual CO2 emissions from fossil fuels and industry (EFF); emissions from land-use change (ELUC); global atmospheric CO2 concentration growth (GATM); mean ocean CO2 sink (SOCEAN); global residual terrestrial CO2 sink (SLAND); uncertainties reported as ±1σ

Outcomes reported

The study quantified all major components of the global carbon budget for 2006–2015, including CO2 emissions from fossil fuels and industry, land-use change, atmospheric concentration growth, and ocean and terrestrial carbon sinks with associated uncertainties. The work synthesised data from energy statistics, cement production, land-cover change, fire activity, ocean observations, and dynamic global vegetation models to provide a comprehensive annual accounting of global anthropogenic CO2 redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Research
Study design
Policy report
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Other
DOI
10.5194/essd-8-605-2016
Catalogue ID
BFmovi1mok-o8inu4

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.