Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Potential Co‐benefits and trade‐offs between improved soil management, climate change mitigation and agri‐food productivity

Ryan McGuire, Paul N. Williams, Pete Smith, S. P. McGrath, Donald M. Curry, Iain Donnison, Bridget Emmet, N.D. Scollan

Food and Energy Security · 2022

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This narrative review, building on a UK Food & Farming Futures workshop, examines the interconnections between soil health—particularly soil organic carbon—and agricultural productivity in the context of meeting 2050 food production targets. The paper synthesises six primary co-benefits spanning environmental, economic, social and political domains, whilst identifying knowledge exchange regarding agri-environmental techniques and soil monitoring/verification as critical to overcoming implementation barriers. The analysis is supported by expert commentary from leading soil and agricultural science institutions in the UK.

UK applicability

Directly applicable to UK policy and practice; the paper emerges from a UK Charity-led workshop and addresses research challenges specific to the UK's capacity to improve soil health. Findings on implementation priorities and barriers are grounded in the UK agricultural and policy context by 2050.

Key measures

Soil organic carbon (SOC), resource-use efficiency, agricultural productivity, greenhouse gas mitigation potential, and soil health indicators (not quantified in abstract)

Outcomes reported

The paper identifies six primary co-benefits of improved soil management: natural capital development, climate change mitigation, carbon trading, crop yield improvements, animal performance enhancement, and human health/nutrition gains. It also examines implementation priorities and barriers to improved soil management by 2050, centred on knowledge exchange and soil monitoring.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil carbon & organic matter
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United Kingdom
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1002/fes3.352
Catalogue ID
BFmovi1txm-e5ye02

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.