Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Beyond the Technology Pork Barrel? An assessment of the Obama administration's energy demonstration projects

David M. Hart

Energy Policy · 2018

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Hart's 2018 policy analysis examines the Obama administration's energy demonstration projects, assessing whether they represented effective strategic investment in emerging energy technologies or constituted politically motivated spending. The work evaluates project design, delivery and outcomes against stated policy goals during 2009–2017. This contribution clarifies how federal energy R&D priorities are formulated and executed, with implications for future technology demonstration policy design.

UK applicability

The findings may inform UK policy design for energy demonstration projects and technology investment strategy, though institutional and political contexts differ. The assessment framework could apply to UK demonstration programmes under government energy and net-zero initiatives.

Key measures

Project design characteristics, implementation fidelity, technology outcomes, alignment with stated policy objectives, cost-effectiveness of demonstration investment

Outcomes reported

The study assessed the design, implementation and outcomes of Obama administration energy demonstration projects (2009–2017) to evaluate their effectiveness as strategic technology investments versus politically motivated expenditure. The analysis examined project contribution to stated federal energy policy objectives.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Food & agricultural policy
Study type
Policy
Study design
Policy report
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United States
System type
Other
DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.047
Catalogue ID
BFmovi1xlq-sssvma

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.