Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Identification of thermal signature and quantification of charcoal in soil using differential scanning calorimetry and benzene polycarboxylic acid (BPCA) markers

Brieuc Hardy, Nils Borchard, Jens Leifeld

SOIL · 2022

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper evaluates differential scanning calorimetry as a tool for identifying and quantifying black carbon in soil, using soil samples from pre-industrial charcoal kiln sites in Belgium and Germany. Charcoal exhibits distinct thermal signatures characterised by exothermic peaks that differ from uncharred soil organic matter, though thermal decomposition ranges overlap, complicating quantification. Strong correlation between DSC and BPCA methods (R² = 0.97) supports the validity of thermal approaches, whilst revealing that operationally defined black carbon measurements require controlled recovery rates for absolute quantitative accuracy.

UK applicability

The methodology may be applicable to UK soil archives and archaeological sites containing charcoal residues, particularly in assessing historical land use and carbon storage. UK regulatory frameworks for soil carbon monitoring and verification could benefit from standardised quantification methods, though further validation in UK soil conditions would be needed.

Key measures

Charcoal-C content by DSC (relative height of exothermic peaks); black carbon quantification by BPCA; thermal decomposition temperatures; degree of aromatic condensation

Outcomes reported

The study compared differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and benzene polycarboxylic acid (BPCA) methods for quantifying charcoal-derived black carbon in soil samples from pre-industrial charcoal kiln sites. DSC and BPCA measurements showed strong correlation (R² = 0.97), though BPCA-derived carbon represented approximately one-fifth of DSC-derived charcoal carbon.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Soil carbon & organic matter
Study type
Research
Study design
Laboratory analytical methods comparison study
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Europe
System type
Laboratory / in vitro
DOI
10.5194/soil-8-451-2022
Catalogue ID
BFmovi21by-1sk1dg

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.