Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Intact and managed peatland soils as a source and sink of GHGs from 1850 to 2100

Jens Leifeld, Chloé Wüst‐Galley, Susan Page

Nature Climate Change · 2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper examines the role of peatland soils as both sources and sinks of greenhouse gases over a 250-year timescale, comparing intact and managed peatlands. Using data synthesis and modelling (as suggested by the title and publication venue), the authors assess how land-use practices and drainage history influence peatland GHG budgets and project these dynamics to 2100. The work implies that peatland management decisions have significant long-term climate implications.

UK applicability

Highly applicable: the United Kingdom contains substantial peatland resources, particularly in Scotland, northern England, and Wales. Understanding GHG dynamics from UK peatlands under different management regimes (grazing, drainage, restoration) directly informs UK land-use policy, carbon accounting, and climate mitigation targets.

Key measures

Greenhouse gas emissions (CO₂, CH₄, N₂O) from peatland soils; temporal trends in GHG flux; projected emissions under different management and climate scenarios to 2100

Outcomes reported

The study assessed peatland soils as sources and sinks of greenhouse gases (GHGs) across historical and projected timescales. It evaluated how different management practices (intact versus managed peatlands) influence net GHG emissions from 1850 to 2100.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Research
Study design
Modelling study / Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Other
DOI
10.1038/s41558-019-0615-5
Catalogue ID
BFmovi21by-9grv3a

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.