Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products

Michael Clark, Marco Springmann, Mike Rayner, Peter Scarborough, Jason Hill, David Tilman, Jennie I. Macdiarmid, Jessica Fanzo, Lauren Bandy, Richard Harrington

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2022

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Clark et al. present a novel approach for estimating the environmental footprint of processed food products by inferring ingredient composition from labelling data and linking to commodity-level lifecycle assessment databases. Analysis of 57,000 products in the UK and Ireland demonstrates a general positive correlation between nutritional quality and environmental sustainability, though notable exceptions exist where seemingly substitutable foods have markedly different environmental profiles. The methodology is presented as robust to uncertainty in ingredient composition and sourcing, offering potential utility for consumer decision-making and retail and policy-level product evaluation.

UK applicability

The study directly assessed 57,000 UK and Irish food products, making findings directly applicable to the UK food environment and retail landscape. The approach could support UK retailer and policy-maker initiatives around environmental labelling and sustainable food system transitions, though implementation would require manufacturer ingredient disclosure and adoption of harmonised environmental impact accounting.

Key measures

Greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water stress, eutrophication potential; NutriScore nutritional profiling; sensitivity analyses on ingredient composition and sourcing uncertainty

Outcomes reported

The study developed and applied a methodology to estimate environmental impacts (greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water stress, and eutrophication potential) across 57,000 food products in the United Kingdom and Ireland by inferring ingredient composition from product labels and pairing with environmental databases. Products were categorised by environmental impact level and cross-referenced with nutritional quality scores (NutriScore).

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Measurement methods & nutrient profiling
Study type
Research
Study design
Meta-analysis / database synthesis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United Kingdom
System type
Food supply chain
DOI
10.1073/pnas.2120584119
Catalogue ID
BFmovi2bj3-exalah

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.