Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Research meetings must be more sustainable

Alberto Sanz-Cobeña, Roberta Alessandrini, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Marco Springmann, Eduardo Aguilera, Barbara Amon, Fabio Bartolini, Markus Geupel, Bruna Grizzetti, Susanna Kugelberg, Catharina Latka, Liang Xia, Anna Birgitte Milford, Patrick Musinguzi, Ee Ling Ng, Helen Suter, Adrian Leip

Nature Food · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This commentary by a consortium of agricultural researchers argues that research meetings and conferences—particularly in food systems and sustainability science—carry substantial environmental costs that undermine the credibility of sustainability research itself. The authors propose that the field should adopt hybrid, low-carbon, and digitally-enabled meeting formats to reduce travel emissions and resource use whilst maintaining scientific collaboration and knowledge exchange.

UK applicability

The recommendations are directly applicable to UK-based agricultural research institutions, funding bodies (such as BBSRC and UKRI), and university conference governance. Adoption of low-carbon meeting practices aligns with UK net-zero commitments and institutional sustainability targets.

Key measures

Carbon footprint, resource consumption, and travel-related emissions associated with research meetings and conferences

Outcomes reported

The paper examines the environmental footprint of research meetings and conferences in the agricultural and food systems sector, and proposes recommendations for reducing their sustainability impact. It reflects on the carbon and resource costs of in-person academic gatherings.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Food & agricultural policy
Study type
Commentary
Study design
Commentary
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Food supply chain
DOI
10.1038/s43016-020-0065-2
Catalogue ID
BFmovi2bj3-rckrbc

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.