Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Construction of a generalised farm typology to aid selection, targeting and scaling of onfarm research

Kirsty L. Hassall, Frédéric Baudron, Chloe MacLaren, Jill E. Cairns, Thokozile Ndhlela, S. P. McGrath, Isaiah Nyagumbo, Stephan M. Haefele

Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · 2023

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper addresses the challenge of farm typology construction by developing a generalised framework that clarifies and quantifies the subjective decisions inherent in categorising diverse smallholder farming systems, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. The authors have encapsulated this framework in an open-source RShiny application (TypologyGenerator) to support researchers and practitioners in designing sampling schemes, targeting interventions, and scaling agricultural research without requiring deep technical expertise in implementation. This contribution improves transparency and reproducibility in farm typology development, a fundamental tool for understanding farming system diversity.

UK applicability

Whilst developed for sub-Saharan African contexts, the generalised framework and TypologyGenerator tool may be applicable to UK farm classification and targeting of agri-environmental schemes or research, though UK farm structure and data availability differ substantially from smallholder contexts.

Key measures

Subjective decision points in farm typology construction; impact of methodological choices on typology outcomes; usability of the TypologyGenerator tool

Outcomes reported

The study presents a generalised framework for constructing farm typologies and quantifies the impact of subjective decisions on resulting typologies. The framework has been operationalised in an open-source RShiny application (TypologyGenerator) to facilitate consistent typology development.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Measurement methods & nutrient profiling
Study type
Research
Study design
Methodological framework development
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Sub-Saharan Africa
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1016/j.compag.2023.108074
Catalogue ID
BFmowc2359-0lq4tm

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.