Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryIndustry / policy report

Potential Co‐benefits and trade‐offs between improved soil management, climate change mitigation and agri‐food productivity

Ryan McGuire, Paul N. Williams, Pete Smith, S. P. McGrath, Donald M. Curry, Iain Donnison, Bridget Emmet, N.D. Scollan

Food and Energy Security · 2022

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This policy-focused paper, based on a 2021 UK Food & Farming Futures workshop, examines the potential co-benefits and trade-offs between improved soil management, climate change mitigation, and agricultural productivity. The authors, supported by commentaries from leading researchers at Aberdeen University and Rothamsted Research, identify six primary co-benefits spanning environmental, economic, social and political domains, whilst identifying knowledge exchange and soil monitoring/verification as critical to overcoming implementation barriers. The work is framed around meeting global food production targets by 2050 whilst maintaining or enhancing soil health and carbon stocks.

UK applicability

Directly applicable to UK policy and practice. The paper draws on UK research expertise and addresses implementation priorities specific to achieving improved soil management in the UK by 2050, informed by national stakeholder engagement through Food & Farming Futures.

Key measures

Soil organic carbon (SOC), resource-use efficiency, agricultural productivity, climate change mitigation potential, natural capital indicators, crop yield, animal performance, and nutritional outcomes

Outcomes reported

The paper identifies six primary co-benefits of improved soil management: natural capital development, climate change mitigation, carbon trading, crop yield improvements, animal performance gains, and human health/nutritional benefits. It also maps research challenges, implementation priorities for soil management by 2050, and barriers centred on knowledge exchange regarding agri-environmental techniques.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil carbon & organic matter
Study type
Policy
Study design
Policy report
Source type
Policy report
Status
Published
Geography
United Kingdom
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1002/fes3.352
Catalogue ID
BFmowc2359-9vvjzt

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.