Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Bacteria and Competing Herbivores Weaken Top–Down and Bottom–Up Aphid Suppression

Carmen K. Blubaugh, Lynne Carpenter‐Boggs, John P. Reganold, Robert N. Schaeffer, William E. Snyder

Frontiers in Plant Science · 2018

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This study reveals that certain non-pathogenic soil bacteria can paradoxically weaken aphid suppression despite their known plant-growth-promoting properties. The researchers found that specific bacterial taxa correlated with increased aphid performance both directly and indirectly by reducing parasitoid-mediated top-down control. Against a complex background of varying soil fertility, microbial diversity and natural enemy communities, the effects of soil microbes on aphid growth exceeded those of nutritional factors alone, suggesting that soil microbial associates must be considered when predicting plant defence strength along nutrient gradients.

UK applicability

These findings have relevance to UK integrated pest management strategies and soil health initiatives, particularly where soil amendments or microbial inoculants are promoted to enhance plant nutrition and defence. The results suggest caution is warranted when introducing plant-growth-promoting bacteria without considering potential indirect effects on pest suppression dynamics.

Key measures

Aphid growth rates, parasitism by parasitoids, plant nutritional status, soil microbial composition, presence of competing herbivores, plant anti-herbivore defences

Outcomes reported

The study examined how non-pathogenic soil bacteria influence aphid population growth and the effectiveness of natural enemies (parasitoids) and competing herbivores in suppressing aphids. The research measured aphid performance, parasitism rates, and plant defence deployment across varying soil fertility, microbial biodiversity and natural enemy presence.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil biology & microbiology
Study type
Research
Study design
Field trial
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United States
System type
Laboratory / in vitro
DOI
10.3389/fpls.2018.01239
Catalogue ID
BFmowc29c6-7lb1qg

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.