Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Assessment of the growth in social groups for sustainable agriculture and land management

Jules Pretty, Simon Attwood, Richard Bawden, Henk van den Berg, Zareen Pervez Bharucha, John Dixon, Cornelia Butler Flora, K Gallagher, Ken Genskow, Sue E. Hartley, Jan Willem Ketelaar, Japhet K. Kiara, Vijay Kumar, Yuelai Lu, Tom MacMillan, Anne Maréchal, Alma Linda Morales-Abubakar, Andrew Noble, P. V. Vara Prasad, Ewald Rametsteiner, John P. Reganold, Jacob I. Ricks, Johan Rockström, Osamu Saitô, Peter S. Thorne, Songliang Wang, Hannah Wittman, Michael Winter, Puyun Yang

Global Sustainability · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper synthesises evidence on the deliberate establishment of more than 8 million social groups for sustainable agriculture and land management across the world over the past 20 years. The authors argue that the growth of rural social capital within specific territories has reversed the sustainability and equity losses caused by neoliberal development, leading to measurable improvements in agricultural productivity and particular benefits for previously excluded communities. The work suggests that further expansion would be enabled by stronger national and regional policy support.

UK applicability

The findings on social capital and institutional restructuring are relevant to UK policy discussions around rural development and farmer-led initiatives. However, the global focus means specific applicability to UK farming systems, scale, and existing institutional contexts would require further localisation.

Key measures

Number of social groups established globally (>8 million); productivity changes in agricultural and land management systems; equity and inclusion metrics for marginalised groups

Outcomes reported

The study assessed the growth and establishment of social groups for sustainable agriculture and land management across the world over the past 20 years, reporting on productivity impacts and equity outcomes. It evaluated how rural social capital restructuring has influenced agricultural and land management system performance, particularly for previously excluded populations.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Food & agricultural policy
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1017/sus.2020.19
Catalogue ID
BFmowc29c6-p80tq5

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.